Next Page        Archive Home  Search

 

The Rawlin(g)s Rollin(g)s Family History Association

 

Vol. 3, No. 1                                               March 1990

 

Dear Cousins:

We begin a new year of THE RAWLIN(G)S/ROLLIN(G)S FAMILY HISTORY ASSOCIATION and the last decade of the 20th Century. Quite an occasion. I hope the '90's will bring you all health, wealth and happiness, but most of all the solving of all of your genealogical puzzles. We are grateful and pleased that some of you have been able to dig deeper among your "roots" and trust that additional informa­tion we might receive in the future will help those who have not yet had their questions answered to their satisfaction. Just stick with us and it might happen!

Our membership is now up to 114, but our roster was at 144. I hope those missing 30 will decide to re-subscribe. If sane of those 30 are satisfied with the information they now have and don't feel they need our help any longer, perhaps they might consider continuing their subscription so that others can be helped as they were. Every little bit helps. We play it pretty close, expense-wise, and although I dislike doing it, those who have not subscribed for 1990 by the first of June will be deleted from the roster.

And speaking of memberships, in re-typing the roster I discovered we have representatives in every state of the Union and Canada except 9 - Louisiana, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, North and South Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wyoming. If you know any R's in those states, drop them a note and tell them about the Association. Maybe they'd like to join with us.

I want to thank so many of you who sent me lovely Christmas cards, and were concerned that the earthquake had shaken us up here in Carmichael. Although my hanging plants and chandeliers swung a bit, and the motion made me a little seasick, we in Sacramento County escaped damage. We are one of the few places in California that is not situated on a fault, for which we thank our lucky stars. But I was touched by your concern.

You will note the 1989 Index is included with this Newsletter, the reason for it being a little more expensive to mail. But everyone seems to like the index.    I know it certainly helps me locate a name in a hurry.

An explanation about the odd figure shown as "Dues/Subs" in the Financial Report on P. 2. Five of our members paid their 1990 dues in early December, and not knowing we were going to raise it, sent checques for $5.00. When they received the December '89 Newsletter they sent the additional $2.50. Their original $5.00 had been incorporated in the December '89 receipt figures.

Keep your queries and information coming. And Happy 1990.

THE EDITOR

 

Next Page        Archive Home  Search